RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-04126
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He desires to enlist in the Air National Guard. He is deeply
sorry for what happened in the past and would like to redeem
himself. He is married with two children, has an aircraft
maintenance license, he is attending school with 70 credit hours
in electronics engineering and is currently employed with the
United Parcel Service. He believes he has a lot to offer the
military.
In support of his request, the applicant provides DD Forms 293,
Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the
Armed Forces of the United States, and an unsigned DD Form 149,
Application for Correction of Military Record Under the
Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 November
1994.
The applicant was tried by a General Court-Martial on 24 October
1996. Between March 1995 and May 1996, the applicant was
accused of stealing or attempting to steal certain items from
the mail system. He was charged with one specification of
attempting to conspire to steal mail matter, in violation of
Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); and
stealing certain mail matter, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ.
The applicant pled guilty and was sentenced to a BCD,
confinement for 10 months, a forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month
for 10 months and a reduction to airman basic. The convening
authority approved the findings and sentence. The sentence was
adjudged on 24 October 1996.
The applicant was discharged on 13 November 1998 with a BCD. He
served 3 years and 4 months on active duty. The period
24 October 1996 through 7 November 1998 was lost time.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial. JAJM states the applicant has
identified no error or injustice related to his prosecution or
the sentence. An examination of the record of trial shows no
error in the processing of the court-martial. Prior to the
trial, the applicant entered into a pretrial agreement. This
agreement specified that the applicant agreed to plead guilty to
the charge and specifications (with some exceptions and
substitutions), in exchange for which the convening authority
agreed not to approve a sentence including confinement in excess
of 10 months.
The applicant provides no justification for his request, and
clemency is not warranted in this case. The applicant has not
provided any letters of support or other documentation to show
that he has engaged in any good works or made any improvement in
his life since the time of his court-martial. The applicants
punishment was well within the legal limits and was an
appropriate punishment for the offenses committed.
Additionally, clemency in this case would be unfair to those
individuals who honorably served their country while in uniform.
The JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 23 December 2009, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
On 16 March 2010, the Board staff requested the applicant
provide documentation pertaining to his post-service activities,
within 30 days (Exhibit E). The applicant states that he truly
regrets what he did. Since his discharge he has worked at UPS
for two years, has taken over 60 college credit hours, he has a
class B drivers license, and has an aircraft mechanic license
airframe and power plant.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we find no evidence
to show that the applicants discharge as a result of his
conviction by court-martial was erroneous or unjust. In view of
the foregoing, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of
the Military Justice Division and adopt the rationale expressed
as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to
sustain his burden of proof of the existence of either an error
or an injustice. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2007-04126 in Executive Session on 11 May 2010, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2007-04126 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 October 2009, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 3 December 2009.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 December 2009.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 16 March 2010.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 30 March 2010.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02929
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02929 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) or honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00235
However, the applicant has provided no documentation showing a pending larceny charge. The JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 May 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03787
A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 8 Dec 10 for review and comment, within 30 days. We have carefully reviewed the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record and do not fine a sufficient basis to excuse the untimely filing of this application. The applicant did not file within three...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01049
The applicants certificates of accomplishment provide scant support for action by the Board in light of the seriousness of the offenses he committed. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants BCD, which had its basis in his conviction by a general court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the UCMJ. However, because of the limited documentation concerning his activities since leaving...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01049
The applicants certificates of accomplishment provide scant support for action by the Board in light of the seriousness of the offenses he committed. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants BCD, which had its basis in his conviction by a general court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the UCMJ. However, because of the limited documentation concerning his activities since leaving...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00082
He received a BCD after trying to get the Air Force to help him with an addiction. However, he was not provided the proper treatment for an opiate addiction and shortly after asking for and not receiving the proper help began writing prescriptions for Oxycodone. The applicant was able to relate in his unsworn statement his contention that he self-referred for help with his addiction and that the Air Force did not give him proper treatment.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02627
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02627 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to general. He was credited with 2 years, 2 months and 17 days of service to include 3 years, 5 months and 3 days of lost time due to confinement. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00537
He was sentenced in accordance with his pleas by a military judge to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for nine months, reduction to the grade of airman basic (E-1), and a fine of $10,000 with the provision that he would serve an additional three months confinement if he did not pay the fine. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03277
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03277 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. The applicant does not provide any support for the idea that he has been rehabilitated since the time of his court-martial 23 years ago. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we find no...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02511
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02511 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The applicant was discharged on 7 January 1985 with a BCD and a narrative reason for separation of Conviction by Court-Martial (Other...